Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund - Series 6: Full Scheme Comparison and Current Status

The Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison matters for investors who came across these two close ended equity schemes while researching older mutual fund NFOs and want to know where they stand today. Both funds were structured with a fixed tenure at launch but follow different investment themes. The ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 scheme appears in multiple plan options in fund records (Direct Dividend, Dividend); this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 article covers all available option variants together since the underlying fund and its investment objective are the same across all options. This Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 breakdown covers category, structure, available data and present day investability of each scheme.

Click Here – Get Free Investment Predictions

Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6: Quick Comparison at a Glance

This Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 table lays out the core facts side by side so you can see how the two close ended funds differ on structure, theme and scale.

Parameter	Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A	ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6
AMC	Nippon India Mutual Fund	ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
Category	Close Ended Equity, Multi Cap	Close ended equity scheme with a 3.5 year tenure
Launch / Era	Launched 23 October 2017	This series belongs to a family of nfos icici prudential mutual fund launched between 2013 and 2015
Benchmark	Nifty 500 TRI (indicative for multi cap category)	Nifty 100
Risk Level	Moderately High	Very High (typical for this category)
Available Options	Growth and IDCW Payout	Direct Dividend, Dividend
Last Available NAV	Around Rs 10.33 (Direct Growth, NAV as of October 2020)	Not publicly available for this specific option
AUM Last Reported	Approx Rs 145 Cr (Regular Plan, last reported)	Not publicly available for this specific option
Current Status	Close ended equity scheme launched October 2017; public NAV tracking thins out after October 2020, consistent with scheme maturity on the fixed tenure date	Close ended with a fixed 3.5 year tenure from launch; most series in this family would have matured by 2017 to 2019 based on their original tenure

About Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A

In this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison, Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A is a close ended equity, multi cap scheme from Nippon India Mutual Fund. Launched 23 October 2017, benchmarked against the Nifty 500 TRI (indicative for multi cap category). Close ended equity scheme launched October 2017; public NAV tracking thins out after October 2020, consistent with scheme maturity on the fixed tenure date. That structure is the Kotak side of the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison.

About ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6

The other half of this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison, ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6, is a diversified large cap equity close ended equity scheme with a 3.5 year tenure from ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund. The scheme is available in multiple plan options including Direct Dividend, Dividend. All these options share the same underlying portfolio and investment objective for ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6; the difference lies only in how income distribution is structured. This series belongs to a family of nfos icici prudential mutual fund launched between 2013 and 2015. Close ended with a fixed 3.5 year tenure from launch; most series in this family would have matured by 2017 to 2019 based on their original tenure. That is the ICICI side of the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison.

Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6: Key Differences Explained

The points below summarise what the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison shows once you move past scheme names and into structure.

• Investment theme: Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A follows a close ended equity, multi cap mandate, while ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 is built around diversified large cap equity, which is a different risk and return profile.
• AMC: Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A comes from Nippon India Mutual Fund, while ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comes from ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, so expense structures, fund management style and distribution reach differ.
• Structure: Close ended equity scheme launched October 2017; public NAV tracking thins out after October 2020, consistent with scheme maturity on the fixed tenure date By comparison, close ended with a fixed 3.5 year tenure from launch; most Series in this family would have matured by 2017 to 2019 based on their original tenure
• Plan options: ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 is available across Direct Dividend, Dividend options, all of which share the same portfolio but differ in distribution mechanism.
• Overall takeaway: the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison ultimately comes down to two different close ended strategies from different fund houses, and neither accepts fresh investment today.

These structural differences sit at the centre of any Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison and matter more than any single data point.

Check the Univest Screener for live fund and stock data

Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6: Are These Schemes Still Open for Fresh Investment

Both schemes in this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison were structured as close ended funds with a fixed tenure, which means neither accepts fresh lumpsum or SIP investment once the original NFO window closes. Investors who already hold units generally have to wait for maturity or a scheme merger to access their money. For Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A, close ended equity scheme launched october 2017; public nav tracking thins out after october 2020, consistent with scheme maturity on the fixed tenure date. For ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6, close ended with a fixed 3.5 year tenure from launch; most Series in this family would have matured by 2017 to 2019 based on their original tenure. Investors seeking similar exposure today can look at ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund's current open ended large cap and flexicap schemes, which is the practical takeaway from this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 status check.

Download the Univest iOS App or Univest Android App to track live NAV updates and screen mutual fund data on the go.

Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6: Which One Fits Your Portfolio

Since both schemes are close ended and not confirmed open for fresh investment, this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison is most useful for existing unit holders trying to understand their scheme's positioning. This Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 guidance section exists for that reason. Investors who already hold either scheme should track maturity dates, merger announcements or IDCW payouts through their AMC's official communication and consolidated account statements, since specific NAV and AUM for ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 were not publicly available for this analysis. That is the core practical lesson of this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison, and it is always worth confirming details with a SEBI registered advisor before deciding.

Conclusion

The Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison shows two different close ended equity strategies, one from Nippon India Mutual Fund and the other from ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund. Neither scheme is confirmed open for fresh investment today. This Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 review is a reminder to check AMC statements for the latest status on any holding. New investors exploring similar strategies should look at current open ended schemes from Nippon India Mutual Fund and ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund and consult a SEBI registered advisor before investing.

Frequently Asked Questions on Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6

The common questions readers ask about the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison are answered below.

Is Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A open for fresh investment right now?

Ans. No. In the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison, Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A is the close ended scheme from Nippon India Mutual Fund. Close ended equity scheme launched October 2017; public NAV tracking thins out after October 2020, consistent with scheme maturity on the fixed tenure date.

Is ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 still open for investment today?

Ans. In the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison, ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 is a close ended equity scheme with a 3.5 year tenure. Close ended with a fixed 3.5 year tenure from launch; most series in this family would have matured by 2017 to 2019 based on their original tenure, so specific current NAV and AUM data are not publicly available.

What is the single biggest difference highlighted in the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison?

Ans. The biggest difference in the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison is investment theme. Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A follows a close ended equity, multi cap mandate, while ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 is built around diversified large cap equity.

Which AMC manages each fund in this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison?

Ans. Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A is managed by Nippon India Mutual Fund, and ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 is managed by ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund.

What should existing investors take away from the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison?

Ans. Existing investors reading this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison should refer to their AMC statements and any maturity or merger notice for the current status of their holding.

Is there an open ended alternative to the schemes in this Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison?

Ans. For ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6, investors can look at ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund's current open ended large cap and flexicap schemes. For Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A, Nippon India Mutual Fund offers other diversified equity schemes for investors seeking similar exposure today.

What risk category applies across the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 comparison?

Ans. Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A is rated Moderately High risk. Close ended equity schemes like ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 are typically also rated Very High risk.

This Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 summary is meant to be read alongside your own AMC statement for full accuracy.

Readers comparing Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 should treat these notes as a starting point, not financial advice.

The Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 pairing shown here reflects the fund records exactly as listed by each AMC.

Anyone tracking the Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 pairing should bookmark their AMC's official scheme page for updates.

This Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV Series A vs ICICI Prudential Growth Fund – Series 6 overview will be updated if either AMC issues a fresh maturity or merger notice.