Univest
Univest
  • Markets

Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC: Which Stock Should You Track

  • September 23, 2026
  • Posted by: Harsh Piplani
  • Category: Market
No Comments
Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC: Which Stock Should You Track

Coromandel International PE 32.27, mkt cap Rs 57,382 crore. Chambal Fertilisers PE 8.69, mkt cap Rs 16,753 crore. GSFC PE 8.74, mkt cap Rs 6,057 crore.

Quick Answer

Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC is a side-by-side comparison of three companies from the Fertilizers space. On this comparison, Coromandel International carries a market capitalisation of about Rs 57,382 crore against Rs 16,753 crore for Chambal Fertilisers and Rs 6,057 crore for GSFC, with return on equity of 15.58%, 18.77% and 5.48% respectively. Each company’s numbers are presented here without a declared better pick, since the right stock depends on an investor’s own criteria.

Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC starts with the core numbers most investors compare within the Fertilizers segment: market capitalisation, valuation multiples, profitability and dividend yield. Figures below are sourced as of September 2026 and will shift with daily price moves.

All three names sit in the Fertilizers bucket, which makes them a natural set to place side by side rather than a random trio of unrelated businesses.

Click Here – Get Free Investment Predictions

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC: Company Overview
  • Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC: Valuation and Profitability Snapshot
  • Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC: Latest Quarterly Results
  • What Should Investors Look at Beyond These Numbers?
  • Conclusion
  • FAQs on Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC
    • What is the market cap difference between Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC?
    • Which of the three has the highest PE ratio?
    • Which of the three has the highest ROE?
    • Which of these three stocks pays the highest dividend yield?
    • What is the debt to equity ratio for Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC?
    • Which of the three trades at the highest price to book value?
    • Is one of Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers or GSFC better than the others?

Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC: Company Overview

Coromandel International is a listed Indian company in the Fertilizers space, tracked here on book value, return ratios and valuation alongside its peers in this comparison.

Chambal Fertilisers is a listed Indian company in the Fertilizers space, tracked here on book value, return ratios and valuation alongside its peers in this comparison.

GSFC is a listed Indian company in the Fertilizers space, tracked here on book value, return ratios and valuation alongside its peers in this comparison.

Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC: Valuation and Profitability Snapshot

Metric Coromandel International Chambal Fertilisers GSFC
Market Cap (approx.) Rs 57,382 crore Rs 16,753 crore Rs 6,057 crore
PE Ratio (TTM) 32.27 8.69 8.74
PB Ratio 4.57 1.61 0.49
Return on Equity (ROE) 15.58% 18.77% 5.48%
EPS (TTM, Rs) 60.27 48.12 17.39
Dividend Yield 0.10% 2.63% 3.29%
Debt to Equity 0.12 0.10 0.00
Book Value per Share (Rs) 425.67 259.78 307.83

Check the Univest Screener for Live Data

On valuation, Coromandel International trades at a PE of 32.27 and a PB of 4.57, Chambal Fertilisers at a PE of 8.69 and a PB of 1.61, while GSFC trades at a PE of 8.74 and a PB of 0.49. On return on equity, the three post 15.58%, 18.77% and 5.48% respectively, and on dividend yield they stand at 0.10%, 2.63% and 3.29%.

Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC: Latest Quarterly Results

Company Latest Quarter Revenue Latest Quarter Net Profit YoY Change (Revenue) QoQ Change (Revenue)
Coromandel International Rs 8,214.58 crore Rs 381.56 crore +15.3% +35.4%
Chambal Fertilisers Rs 5,053.96 crore Rs 523.60 crore -12.0% +79.6%
GSFC Rs 3,616.73 crore Rs 158.54 crore +62.5% +35.6%

Quarterly figures above are the most recent reported quarter for each company (Q1 FY28, quarter ended June 2026), compared with the year-ago and preceding quarter.

Download the Univest iOS App or Univest Android App to track Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC live prices.

What Should Investors Look at Beyond These Numbers?

Beyond the metrics above, investors comparing these three fertilizers names should track quarter-on-quarter revenue and margin trends, management commentary on demand and cost drivers, and any sector-specific regulatory developments, since a single-quarter snapshot can shift quickly.

Conclusion

Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC highlights how differently three companies in the same fertilizers segment can score across valuation, profitability and dividend metrics, even when operating in a similar space. This comparison does not declare a winner; investors should weigh these figures against their own research and risk appetite. Please read the disclaimer below before making any investment decision.

Disclaimer: Data and figures in this article are sourced from publicly available information as of September 2026 and may not reflect real-time prices. Please verify all data independently before making any investment decision. This comparison does not recommend or endorse any single stock over another; investments in securities are subject to market risk. This content is for educational purposes only and is not investment advice by Univest (SEBI RA INH000013776).

FAQs on Coromandel International vs Chambal Fertilisers vs GSFC

What is the market cap difference between Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC?

Ans. As of September 2026, Coromandel International has a market cap of approximately Rs 57,382 crore, Chambal Fertilisers is at approximately Rs 16,753 crore, and GSFC is at approximately Rs 6,057 crore.

Which of the three has the highest PE ratio?

Ans. Among Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC, the PE ratios stand at 32.27, 8.69 and 8.74 respectively as of September 2026.

Which of the three has the highest ROE?

Ans. Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC post ROE of 15.58%, 18.77% and 5.48% respectively as of September 2026.

Which of these three stocks pays the highest dividend yield?

Ans. Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC carry dividend yields of 0.10%, 2.63% and 3.29% respectively.

What is the debt to equity ratio for Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC?

Ans. Coromandel International carries a debt to equity of 0.12, Chambal Fertilisers of 0.10, and GSFC of 0.00.

Which of the three trades at the highest price to book value?

Ans. Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers and GSFC trade at price to book ratios of 4.57, 1.61 and 0.49 respectively.

Is one of Coromandel International, Chambal Fertilisers or GSFC better than the others?

Ans. This comparison does not declare one stock better than another; each company scores differently across valuation, profitability and dividend metrics, and the right fit depends on an individual investor’s own criteria and research.



fertilizers Stock Market
Author: Harsh Piplani
I am Harsh Piplani, an Assistant Content Manager with over 5 years of experience in crafting impactful, result-driven content. I hold a B.Com (Hons) degree and have worked across diverse industries, including education, fintech, healthcare, jewellery, and more. I specialise in content strategy, SEO, and optimisation, ensuring that every piece I create is not just well-written but also well-ranked. I believe content should do more than fill space so as to drive traffic, build authority, and support business growth. I enjoy turning complex ideas into clear, engaging narratives, and, as I like to say, I know how to spin words like a web to influence, structured, strategic, and impossible to ignore. For me, great content sits at the intersection of creativity and performance.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply