Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A: Full Scheme Comparison and Current Status

August 4, 2026
Posted by: Ankit Jaiswal
Category: Mutual Funds

Kotak India Growth Fund Series I last NAV Not publicly available in recent trackers. Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A NAV and AUM not publicly available for this specific option.

The Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison matters for investors who came across these two close ended equity schemes while researching older mutual fund NFOs and want to know where they stand today. Both funds were structured with a fixed tenure at launch but follow different investment themes. This Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A breakdown covers category, structure, available data and present day investability of each scheme.

Click Here – Get Free Investment Predictions

Table of Contents

Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A: Quick Comparison at a Glance

This Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A table lays out the core facts side by side so you can see how the two close ended funds differ on structure, theme and scale.

Parameter	Kotak India Growth Fund Series I	Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A
AMC	Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund	Nippon India Mutual Fund
Category	Close Ended Equity, Multi Cap	Close ended equity oriented scheme with a 3 year tenure from allotment
Launch / Era	Launched 06 May 2015	This series belongs to a family of nfos launched under the reliance brand (now nippon india mutual fund) between 2013 and 2017
Benchmark	Nifty 200 TRI	Not confirmed in public trackers for this Series
Risk Level	Very High	Very High (typical for this category)
Last Available NAV	Not publicly available in recent trackers	Not publicly available for this specific option
AUM Last Reported	Approx Rs 435 Cr (last reported)	Not publicly available for this specific option
Current Status	Close ended scheme launched May 2015; public NAV and AUM data for this older vintage series are limited in current fund trackers, consistent with maturity of the fixed tenure	Close ended with a fixed 3 year tenure; the amc was renamed from reliance mutual fund to nippon india mutual fund in 2019, and most series in this family would have matured on their original schedule

About Kotak India Growth Fund Series I

In this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison, Kotak India Growth Fund Series I is a close ended equity, multi cap scheme from Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund. Launched 06 May 2015, benchmarked against the Nifty 200 TRI. Close ended scheme launched May 2015; public NAV and AUM data for this older vintage series are limited in current fund trackers, consistent with maturity of the fixed tenure. That structure is the Kotak side of the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison.

About Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A

The other half of this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison, Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A, is a diversified equity with a growth mandate close ended equity oriented scheme with a 3 year tenure from allotment from Nippon India Mutual Fund. This series belongs to a family of nfos launched under the reliance brand (now nippon india mutual fund) between 2013 and 2017. Close ended with a fixed 3 year tenure; the amc was renamed from reliance mutual fund to nippon india mutual fund in 2019, and most series in this family would have matured on their original schedule. That is the Nippon side of the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison.

Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A: Key Differences Explained

The points below summarise what the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison shows once you move past scheme names and into structure.

Investment theme: Kotak India Growth Fund Series I follows a close ended equity, multi cap mandate, while Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A is built around diversified equity with a growth mandate, which is a different risk and return profile.
AMC: Kotak India Growth Fund Series I comes from Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, while Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comes from Nippon India Mutual Fund, so expense structures, fund management style and distribution reach differ.
Structure: Close ended scheme launched May 2015; public NAV and AUM data for this older vintage series are limited in current fund trackers, consistent with maturity of the fixed tenure By comparison, close ended with a fixed 3 year tenure; the AMC was renamed from Reliance Mutual Fund to Nippon India Mutual Fund in 2019, and most Series in this family would have matured on their original schedule
Overall takeaway: the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison ultimately comes down to two different close ended strategies from different fund houses, and neither accepts fresh investment today.

These structural differences sit at the centre of any Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison and matter more than any single data point.

Check the Univest Screener for live fund and stock data

Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A: Are These Schemes Still Open for Fresh Investment

Both schemes in this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison were structured as close ended funds with a fixed tenure, which means neither accepts fresh lumpsum or SIP investment once the original NFO window closes. Investors who already hold units generally have to wait for maturity or a scheme merger to access their money. For Kotak India Growth Fund Series I, close ended scheme launched may 2015; public nav and aum data for this older vintage series are limited in current fund trackers, consistent with maturity of the fixed tenure. For Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A, close ended with a fixed 3 year tenure; the AMC was renamed from Reliance Mutual Fund to Nippon India Mutual Fund in 2019, and most Series in this family would have matured on their original schedule. Investors seeking similar exposure today can look at Nippon India Mutual Fund’s current open ended equity schemes, which is the practical takeaway from this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A status check.

Download the Univest iOS App or Univest Android App to track live NAV updates and screen mutual fund data on the go.

Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A: Which One Fits Your Portfolio

Since both schemes are close ended and not confirmed open for fresh investment, this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison is most useful for existing unit holders trying to understand their scheme’s positioning. This Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A guidance section exists for that reason. Investors who already hold either scheme should track maturity dates, merger announcements or IDCW payouts through their AMC’s official communication and consolidated account statements, since specific NAV and AUM for Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A were not publicly available for this analysis. That is the core practical lesson of this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison, and it is always worth confirming details with a SEBI registered advisor before deciding.

Conclusion

The Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison shows two different close ended equity strategies, one from Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund and the other from Nippon India Mutual Fund. Neither scheme is confirmed open for fresh investment today. This Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A review is a reminder to check AMC statements for the latest status on any holding. New investors exploring similar strategies should look at current open ended schemes from Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund and Nippon India Mutual Fund and consult a SEBI registered advisor before investing.

Disclaimer: Data and figures in this article are sourced from publicly available information. These may or may not be accurate. Please verify all data with the official NSE (nseindia.com) and BSE (bseindia.com) websites before making any investment decision. Investments in securities are subject to market risk. This content is for educational purposes only and is not investment advice by Univest (SEBI RA INH000013776).

Frequently Asked Questions on Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A

The common questions readers ask about the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison are answered below.

Is Kotak India Growth Fund Series I open for fresh investment right now?

Ans. No. In the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison, Kotak India Growth Fund Series I is the close ended scheme from Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund. Close ended scheme launched May 2015; public NAV and AUM data for this older vintage series are limited in current fund trackers, consistent with maturity of the fixed tenure.

Is Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A still open for investment today?

Ans. In the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison, Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A is a close ended equity oriented scheme with a 3 year tenure from allotment. Close ended with a fixed 3 year tenure; the amc was renamed from reliance mutual fund to nippon india mutual fund in 2019, and most series in this family would have matured on their original schedule, so specific current NAV and AUM data are not publicly available.

What is the single biggest difference highlighted in the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison?

Ans. The biggest difference in the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison is investment theme. Kotak India Growth Fund Series I follows a close ended equity, multi cap mandate, while Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A is built around diversified equity with a growth mandate.

Which AMC manages each fund in this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison?

Ans. Kotak India Growth Fund Series I is managed by Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund, and Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A is managed by Nippon India Mutual Fund.

What should existing investors take away from the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison?

Ans. Existing investors reading this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison should refer to their AMC statements and any maturity or merger notice for the current status of their holding.

Is there an open ended alternative to the schemes in this Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison?

Ans. For Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A, investors can look at Nippon India Mutual Fund’s current open ended equity schemes. For Kotak India Growth Fund Series I, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund offers other diversified equity schemes for investors seeking similar exposure today.

What risk category applies across the Kotak India Growth Fund Series I vs Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A comparison?

Ans. Kotak India Growth Fund Series I is rated Very High risk. Close ended equity schemes like Nippon India Capital Builder Fund IV – Series A are typically also rated Very High risk.

News

Author: Ankit Jaiswal

Ankit Jaiswal is the Senior Research Analyst at Univest, leading the platform's in-house equity research desk and serving as the editorial reviewer for all research and blog content published at univest.in. With 11+ years of experience in Indian equity markets, he oversees stock recommendations, earnings analysis, sector coverage, and ensures every published article meets SEBI Research Analyst Regulations. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce (B.Com) from St. Xavier's College, Kolkata — one of India's most prestigious commerce institutions — and has cleared CMT Level 2 from the CMT Association, a globally recognised certification in technical analysis and market research. His research methodology combines fundamental analysis (earnings quality, balance sheet strength, management commentary) with advanced technical analysis (chart patterns, momentum indicators, market structure) — giving Univest's retail investors a dual-lens approach that most Indian research platforms lack. Ankit is among the most comprehensively certified analysts in Indian financial media, holding five NISM certifications: Series-XV (Research Analyst), Series-VIII (Equity Derivatives), Series-VII (SORM), Series-VI (Depository Operations), and Series-V-A (Mutual Fund Distributors). At Univest — India's SEBI-registered research and advisory platform — Ankit's responsibilities include leading the research team, finalising stock recommendations published across Pro Lite, Pro Super, and Pro Gold advisory services, and maintaining editorial oversight of all YMYL financial content published on the blog.